This E&E Interactive Project requires a modern browser with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) support.

U.S. EPA's implementation of the Clean Power Plan is on hold while the courts review the rule.

Twenty-seven states and major business groups are challenging the Clean Power Plan in court. Many suing states announced shortly after the Supreme Court decided in February 2016 to stay the rule that they would halt planning activities. Others are charging ahead with their work. While the rule is stayed, EPA cannot require any action from states.

EPA published the final Clean Power Plan on Aug. 3, 2015, significantly revising an earlier draft version of the rule to respond to concerns from states, industry groups and other stakeholders.

The regulation gives states two more years to submit plans and start making carbon cuts. It contains "trading-ready" elements for states that want to assign targets for electricity generators and allow them to purchase credits or allowances to meet goals.

EPA has proposed options for a federal plan to impose on states that do not submit adequate blueprints for reducing carbon emissions by required amounts. The agency also hopes to finalize model trading rules.

To learn more about how the rule works, read our summary of the Clean Power Plan.

To read more about Clean Power Plan lawsuits, see our overview of legal challenges.

To read more about grid issues, see our overview of reliability concerns and assurance mechanisms.

To see research and other resources prepared by consultants and trade groups, visit our Power Plan Toolbox.

Last updated on September 19, 2016 at 2:46 PM

For questions or comments about E&E’s Power Plan Hub or related stories, please email staff reporters Emily Holden and Rod Kuckro at

National Stories and Videos


E&E News' Bravender talks confirmation controversies as nominees prep for conflict

As the first week of the 115th Congress ends, lawmakers are gearing up for the start of confirmation hearings for President-elect Donald Trump's administration. What can we expect, and how will this week's flurry of legislative activity shape the direction of the new Congress? On today's The Cutting Edge, E&E News reporter Robin Bravender previews the issues to watch during the confirmation hearings and talks about the landscape for new legislation this year.


Super PAC rules would keep Pruitt's corporate cash flowing

One of the country's largest coal companies contributed $50,000 to a political action committee supporting Scott Pruitt in August, just as the company and the Oklahoma attorney general prepared for a key court appearance in their challenge to U.S. EPA's sweeping restrictions on power plants. Murray Energy Corp., the Ohio-based mine owner, will be able to make a similar contribution this year, legal experts say, even if the Senate confirms Pruitt, a Republican, to run EPA. The practical impact: Pruitt's Super PAC, Liberty 2.0, can keep raising money from the corporate interests he is charged with regulating.


Agency chiefs take victory laps, tout work on climate

It's closing time for the Obama administration. In a series of exit memorandums released today, agency chiefs lauded their accomplishments during the past eight years, with energy and environmental agencies touting their efforts to boost renewable energy, fight pollution and address climate change.


From 'The Possum' to EPA boss

BROKEN ARROW, Okla. — Before he was Donald Trump's pick to lead U.S. EPA, Scott Pruitt was a kid from Kentucky who grooved to country music, drove a '78 Chevy Blazer and hoped to make it as a big-league baseball player. His college teammates called him "The Possum."

More stories and videos ▾

Federal Register Documents

Key Documents

Draft Rule Comments

National and Regional Organizations

Coal Interests

Utility Groups

Trade Groups

Public Interest and Research Groups