Re-engineering the Mississippi River will stem catastrophic economic and environmental losses from human development and climate change while raising billions of dollars in value, according to a report released yesterday.
The paper, titled "Answering 10 Fundamental Questions about the Mississippi River Delta," highlights the need to protect against land losses and preserve ecosystems along the Gulf Coast. Scientists and engineers from environmental advocacy groups and research institutions contributed to the report, noting that a quarter of the land on the bayou has eroded over the past 100 years, which they attributed to activities like damming the water for energy and flood control, dredging the riverbed for shipping and diverting the river for irrigation.
These actions halved the amount of sediment flowing into the delta to replenish the landscape, and if the process continues unabated, thousands of square kilometers of land will wash into the ocean, with more than $350 billion in losses over the next 20 years, according to the report. Meanwhile, sea levels are rising and weather events like hurricanes are becoming more extreme, accelerating the process and threatening to submerge cities like New Orleans.
This was described as having huge repercussions, not just for Louisiana but for the United States as a whole. "The Mississippi Delta is phenomenally important to the nation," said Sam Bentley, one of the report's co-authors and a professor specializing in sediment in the Department of Geology and Geophysics at Louisiana State University.
He explained that the region is critical for offshore oil drilling and is a transit route for close to 20 percent of America's shipping and navigation, particularly for grain from the Midwest. The waters provide one-third of seafood tonnage served in the United States, and many species spawn over the silt near the mouth of the Mississippi.
But the delta's 2 million residents have watched the sand beneath their feet washing away over the years, with no end in sight. The delta constantly gains and loses land, but losses have drastically outpaced gains.
A 2009 study by Michael Blum and Harry Roberts in Nature Geoscience found that the delta could lose up to 13,500 square kilometers of land by 2100. Many have already left the region, fearing for their homes and their jobs, in the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita as well as the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.
'A state of environmental decline'
"[The delta is] in a state of environmental decline that threatens a large amount of commerce and ecosystem services," said Bentley, who co-authored the report. "Even if there were no climate change, even if we were in a steady state right now, the delta would continue to subside and erode into the ocean." This will raise fuel prices, hamper the economy, reduce biodiversity and threaten food security.
"By letting this system completely collapse, you lose a lot of those economically important species," said Alisha Renfro, a coastal scientist with the National Wildlife Federation. In addition, without the delta as a shield, the coast along Louisiana and Mississippi is more vulnerable to storms and saltwater intrusion.
The report calls for an all-out approach that includes mitigating the damage, restoring land and adapting to a new normal. "The situation is so dire that all the tools in the toolbox need to be used," said Angelina Freeman, a coastal scientist at the Environmental Defense Fund and a co-author.
One strategy is to mimic how the river picks up sediment upstream and deposits it on the delta. John Day, a professor emeritus in the Department of Oceanography and Coastal Sciences at LSU, said that upstream water can be routed into wetlands and then back into the river "to restart the natural function of the delta." Engineers can also construct bypasses that allow sediments to flow around obstructions like dams on the Mississippi.
Expensive engineering required
In addition, Day said that sediment can be physically pumped to coastal areas to deliberately create new land, but the process is very energy-intensive and expensive. Farther out in the ocean, breakwaters can reduce waves and land losses to the sea.
Communities along the delta need to raise their homes to accommodate flooding with small levees to direct torrents away from neighborhoods. Roads, sewers and electrical lines also need to be protected against rising water.
Many of these strategies are echoed in Louisiana's 2012 Coastal Master Plan, an effort by the state's Costal Protection and Restoration Authority to save the delta. But where the master plan lays out Louisiana's approach to the Gulf Coast, yesterday's delta report is a rallying call for the rest of the country to get involved for the sake of the national economy. "It's not a state problem; it's a national problem, and it needs a national-level solution," Bentley said.
The report tabulates these interventions to cost $50 billion initially, with estimates peaking at $150 billion, but the report's authors say the cost of doing nothing is much higher. They anticipate receiving some funding under the "RESTORE Act of 2011," which passed the Senate last month and is currently working its way through the House.
The bill would allocate 80 percent of BP PLC's fines for its role in the Deepwater Horizon spill to the Gulf region. Restoring wetlands could also be lucrative; according to the report, wetland restoration can create more than twice as many jobs as the oil and gas industry and road construction industry combined. Newly restored areas will bring $62 billion in ecosystem services to the region, as well.
However, with the climate shifting, the clock is ticking and it is already too late for the coast to make a complete recovery. "We can't recreate what used to be there, but on the other hand, this is a living coast," Freeman said, noting that lives and livelihoods are at stake along the Gulf and across the country.
The report's authors acknowledge that some people will have to move away from the coast and that large-scale geoengineering can have unintended consequences. Still, experts argue that rebuilding the Mississippi River Delta should be a national priority. "We're looking for the nation to address this the same way the nation looked at the restoration of the Everglades," said Bentley. "The conservation of the Mississippi Delta merits as much resources."
Want to read more stories like this?
E&E is the leading source for comprehensive, daily coverage of environmental and energy politics and policy.
Click here to start a free trial to E&E -- the best way to track policy and markets.