This E&E Interactive Project requires a modern browser with Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) support.

Draft rule reduction: 38.4% (493 lbs CO2 / MWh)

Editor's note: The following summary represents state and utility stances after the Supreme Court stayed the Clean Power Plan in February 2016.

Texas is among more than two dozen states challenging U.S. EPA's Clean Power Plan, and the Lone Star State has given no indication that it will develop a state plan.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton (R) celebrated the Supreme Court stay of the Clean Power Plan on a conference call the day after it was announced. "The whole point of the stay was to stop us from having to provide any implementation plan," Paxton said, adding that "we’re not moving forward with anything until this case is resolved." The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality declined to comment on the Supreme Court’s move, as litigation remains pending.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) also has been critical of EPA's plan, saying last year it amounted to "unilateral executive overreach" and would lead to higher energy prices for consumers and cost jobs.

The governor cited the Clean Power Plan during a January speech in which he proposed constitutional amendments to rein in the federal government.

Bryan Shaw, chairman of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), said early this year that Texas wasn't actively moving toward developing a state plan, although that could change.

"We're still looking at what we're going to do and when we're going to do it," Shaw said. "We're hopeful that we're going to get some action from the courts."

Under the rule, Texas would need to cut its power-sector carbon emissions rate about 33 percent below 2012 levels by 2030, compared with an earlier target of more than 38 percent.

Some major power producers in the state have supported the idea of reducing carbon emissions, including NRG Energy Inc. and Austin Energy. But Luminant, a generator that's part of Energy Future Holdings Corp., has taken issue with possible effects and discussed a need for reliable and affordable supplies.

The Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT), the state's main grid operator, said last year that the Clean Power Plan could lead to the closure of at least 4,000 megawatts of coal-fired generation and an increase in retail power prices.

The Texas Public Policy Foundation has applauded efforts to fight EPA's carbon plan, saying it would expand EPA's power while increasing electricity costs and not providing a significant benefit in terms of global temperatures.

Environmental groups have touted potential health and climate benefits as they push for Texas to craft a state plan.

Cyrus Reed, conservation director with the Sierra Club's Lone Star Chapter, said in January that Texas should start preparing a plan and ask for an extension even amid litigation. That could lead to a backup plan if the rule went into effect in some form.

State Rep. Drew Darby (R) indicated in January he wasn't sure whether Texas would file for an extension, saying it was beyond his "pay grade."

"I'm simply trying to make sure, from my standpoint, that we understand what the problems are, we understand what the options are and that we come up with a Texas solution that protects Texas taxpayers and consumers," he said.

Last updated on May 13, 2016 at 5:50 PM

For questions or comments about E&E’s Power Plan Hub or related stories, please email

Latest Stories and Videos


MISO urged to disclose power plant shutdown notices

No matter how the Donald Trump presidency plays out, or whether the Clean Power Plan survives, the Midwest power grid will see dozens of older coal-fired power plants shut down in the next few years. The region's grid operator, the Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO), can keep plants running if they are necessary to keep the lights on. But when it comes to knowing which ones will close, and when, will the public be left in the dark?

Clean Power Plan

Texas co-op expands renewable portfolio as power plan concerns linger

As many electric cooperatives move toward expanding their portfolios to include a greater percentage of renewables, will co-ops be better equipped to meet the requirements of the Clean Power Plan? During today's OnPoint, John Hewa, CEO of Pedernales Electric Cooperative, explains how his company has shifted its portfolio to include more solar and wind, but says concerns remain over the power plan's impacts on coal-fired power generation.


Inside the uphill battle against carbon trading

When Jihan Gearon left home to study environmental science at Stanford University in California in 1999, she felt as if she never fit in. Having lived in one of the poorest areas in the country, Gearon couldn't relate to what she saw as "superficial" environmentalism. Those experiences in school and in the first few years of her career drove Gearon toward the environmental justice movement. She is now working with a national coalition of groups that oppose using carbon trading to cut greenhouse gas emissions under U.S. EPA's Clean Power Plan.


Does the Clean Power Plan create 'winners' and 'losers' among the states?

Political foes are hurling sound-bite criticisms at U.S. EPA's Clean Power Plan that could resonate with voters. Now they're honing a new argument -- that the regulation's disparate standards will serve as a "transfer of wealth" from the energy-producing heartland to left-leaning coastal states that have easier emission reduction targets.


EPA rule earns ridicule in oil and gas country, but some support percolates

HOUSTON -- If there's one thing traditional oil and gas states don't like, it's being told how energy policy should work. Consider the ferocity of comments from three of the country's most prominent energy-producing states that followed this week's release of U.S. EPA's Clean Power Plan, which aims to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from power plants. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) said the federal government seems "hell-bent on threatening" principles of a free market. Oklahoma Gov. Mary Fallin (R) called EPA's plan "one of the most expansive and expensive regulatory burdens ever imposed on U.S. families and businesses." Louisiana Attorney General James Caldwell (R) said EPA's move "will lead to fewer jobs and higher utility bills."


With Earth Day on horizon, climate change will be talk of Texas committee

The notice for one of today's committee hearings in Austin, Texas, might seem a little disorienting at first. "The committee will meet to hear invited testimony only on International and Intergovernmental Efforts to Mitigate Climate Change," reads the online posting for a meeting of the Texas House of Representatives' Committee on International Trade & Intergovernmental Affairs. It says public and invited testimony will be taken on several bills. There's H.B. 2078, which would create a commission on climate change. And H.B. 2080, which outlines how to move ahead on a possible plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. There's also H.B. 2571, which aims to include climate variability in planning at state agencies. Is this still Texas, the proud epicenter of oil and gas, where goals on climate change often encounter skepticism?


Plan to expand regional support for wind power takes shape in the Midwest

MINNEAPOLIS -- To be sure, Tom Kiernan, CEO of the American Wind Energy Association, and Bob Inglis, the former Southern Republican congressman and free-market enthusiast, are not political soul mates. So when they got together in the Twin Cities last week for a discussion about the future of U.S. energy, their banter at times showed they were two distinct political species.


Can EPA's climate plan work without a national transmission plan?

The $300 million high-voltage "V-Plan" transmission line running 122 miles across Kansas opened last month, adding capacity to connect more generators to the grid. It has taken more than four years to complete -- a sprint as big power line projects go. Charted by the Southwest Power Pool, the grid operator in nine states from Nebraska to Louisiana, the project exemplifies the long lead times such projects require -- eight years is not remarkable, officials say. That is a central issue raised by SPP and other opponents of U.S. EPA's proposed Clean Power Plan, with its requirement to replace older coal-fired power plants with gas turbines or wind power, some of them in new locations requiring new transmission.


Could a Republican Senate derail Obama's climate agenda?

With only a week to go before the 2014 midterm elections, polling from key battleground states indicates a small but widening advantage for Republicans. A six-seat net gain in the Senate would put both chambers of Congress under GOP control, uniting the two houses in opposition to many of the hallmark policies of the Obama presidency, including rules to curb carbon emissions from the nation's power sector.


'Tight' EPA timelines hover over end of utility regulators' gathering

DALLAS -- Utility regulators closed their summer meetings yesterday, but they know the real work on U.S. EPA's carbon proposal lies ahead. Just not that far ahead. The EPA proposal, released last month, is expected to be finalized next year. Initial plans on how states will move to curb carbon dioxide emissions from existing power plants are expected by mid-2016. "The timeline may be too tight," said Jon McKinney, a commissioner from West Virginia, adding that the flexibility he'd like for short- and long-term moves "is just not quite there."


EPA's McCarthy pushes states to adopt carbon-cutting 'investment strategy'

DALLAS -- Gina McCarthy, the administrator of U.S. EPA, appeared at a meeting of state regulators to provide what she called a "signal." "Our energy world is changing, and really the key opportunity here is to embrace a direction that's good and available and reliable and responsible and affordable for each state," McCarthy said, "and to figure out how you can achieve these carbon pollution reductions in a way that's moving in that same direction."


Some state agencies prepare to challenge new EPA carbon rule

States have had several weeks to mull over U.S. EPA's Clean Power Plan (CPP), which, once finalized, would set standards for greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants. While most are keeping mute as they analyze the rule and prepare to submit comments, a few early movers have already taken action, either to challenge the rule or comply with it -- and, in some cases, both.


Nation's biggest carbon emitter is well-positioned to weather EPA rule

HOUSTON -- In Texas, elected leaders don't flinch when a new directive heads their way from Washington. Especially when it's from U.S. EPA. So it came as no surprise Monday when two Republicans -- Rick Perry, the current Texas governor, and Greg Abbott, the attorney general and gubernatorial nominee -- blasted a proposed U.S. EPA rule on power plants that aims to cut carbon dioxide emissions 30 percent by 2030 compared with 2005. Yet, Texas observers said, the state is well-positioned for changes to meet future reductions and actually may thrive as more use of power from wind, solar and natural gas could play right into the state's wheelhouse.


States divided, wary as rule release draws near

The planned release Monday of U.S. EPA's proposal for slashing heat-trapping emissions from existing power plants will shine a spotlight on how states will meet its mandate. It's going to be complicated. There's no single starting line. Where a state begins will depend on its politics and power supply. And every one of them is concerned that the coming rule won't fully protect its interests.


DRAFT RULE Public Comments