Challenge to mine safety commission fizzles on procedural grounds

By Alex Guillén | 08/07/2026 01:44 PM EDT

The fight was part of a broader push against the use of administrative law judges and executive branch tribunals across the federal government.

A miner gathers his thought before taking part in a rescue mission, Tuesday, Jan. 3, 2006, in Tallmansville, W.Va.

A constitutional challenge to a mine safety commission ended with a whimper on procedural grounds. Haraz N. Ghanbari/AP

A novel constitutional challenge to the authority of a 48-year-old mine safety commission ended abruptly Friday because of procedural errors.

The attack on the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission was part of a broader conservative legal push arguing administrative law judges and in-house agency tribunals at multiple federal agencies wrongly give the executive branch powers reserved for the courts.

The case here involved a miner fired from a silicon dioxide mine in Seneca, Missouri, owned by American Tripoli. Silicon dioxide rock is turned into powder used as a component of glass and toothpaste and as an anti-caking agent in spices.

Advertisement

The worker, Robert Baumann, alleged he was fired for speaking with a mine inspector. The company argued his output was down and he had abandoned his post to accompany the inspector.