Admin opposes bill protecting Nevada’s Ruby Mountains

By Scott Streater | 02/13/2026 06:43 AM EST

A Senate Energy and Natural Resources panel debated lands bills while skirting expected fights over offshore drilling and seabed mining.

Chris French, associate chief of the Forest Service, testifies before a Senate Energy and Natural Resources subcommittee on Feb. 12.

Chris French, associate chief of the Forest Service, said the Trump administration will oppose any legislation or administrative measures that remove public lands from multiple uses. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee

Democrats on the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee sparred with Trump administration officials Thursday over bills that would withdraw thousands of acres of public lands from oil and gas drilling and mining.

The animated debate over the mineral withdrawal measures marked otherwise abbreviated Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests and Mining hearing that included only brief discussion on a handful of the 23 measures on the agenda — and largely skirted expected fights over offshore drilling and deep seabed mining.

Both Chris French, the Forest Service’s associate chief, and Jon Raby, director of Bureau of Land Management’s Nevada state office, testified that their agencies opposed several bills before the subcommittee aimed at withdrawing lands from oil and gas development in northeastern Nevada’s Ruby Mountains and two other measures in New Mexico to expand the boundaries of a national monument and to block a gravel mine.

Advertisement

“We do not support actions that limit our management flexibility or conflict with executive orders and other administration policies,” French said. “To this end, the administration does not support further mineral withdrawals by the federal estate, and/or additional wilderness or wild and scenic river designations that limit our management.”

GET FULL ACCESS