DOE pressed to dismantle industry-linked coal advisory group

By James Marshall | 09/15/2021 01:08 PM EDT

A collection of Western conservation groups is urging the Department of Energy to either disband or restructure its coal advisory group.

Coal on the ground at the Savage Energy Terminal on Aug. 26, 2016, in Price, Utah.

The Western Organization of Resource Councils in a letter urges the Energy Department to disband or reorganize the National Coal Council, saying it is intertwined with industry and includes no perspective from groups critical of coal’s impacts. George Frey/Getty Images

A collection of Western conservation groups is urging the Department of Energy to either disband or restructure its coal advisory group.

Composed largely of industry executives and academics, the National Coal Council was created in 1984 to give advice on coal policy to the Energy secretary.

The Western Organization of Resource Councils told Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm in a letter released today that NCC’s bias toward preserving the coal industry “is glaringly obvious” in meeting transcripts.


“NCC meetings are devoid of any counterbalancing perspectives from individuals or organizations working to address the negative impacts of coal extraction or its burning for power generation,” wrote Robert LeResche, a Wyoming rancher who is the chair of WORC.

WORC, which has eight member groups across seven states, is active in conservation and job transition issues related to coal mining in the West. The organization obtained some NCC records from litigation it started last year over the advisory group’s activities (Energywire, Oct. 16, 2020).

WORC’s letter noted that a speaker at one coal council meeting said “the single most important priority for the committee” is to “preserve and rejuvenate the existing coal fleet.”

Grace Bochenek, former director of the National Energy Technology Laboratory, at one point led meeting attendees in a “C-O-A-L” chant, records obtain by WORC show.

An NCC report last year held up carbon capture technology as a solution to the coal industry’s woes. It also lamented federal policies favoring renewable energy for “discriminating against energy sources” (E&E News PM, July 16, 2020).

WORC took particular issue with NCC’s affiliated trade nonprofit, NCC Inc. It has the same membership as NCC and is funded through contributions from coal companies, the letter says.

NCC counts representatives of major coal mining companies Arch Resources Inc., Peabody Energy Corp. and Alliance Resource Partners LP among its members.

“It is highly problematic for a federal advisory committee to have a corporate alter-ego structured as a non-profit trade association for regulated industry,” LeResche wrote.

A spokesperson for WORC, a nonprofit, said it receives funding from Bloomberg Philanthropies, the Just Transition Fund, and the Rockefeller Family Fund, as well as relying on membership dues and grassroots fundraising.

NCC did not respond to a phone call or email; the Energy Department also did not respond to a request for comment.