Ethanol boosters kicking Pruitt while he’s down

By Nick Bowlin | 06/19/2018 06:59 AM EDT

Defenders of the renewable fuel standard are mobilizing against EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt amid mounting ethics allegations.

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt meeting with agriculture leaders in South Dakota about the renewable fuel standard.

EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt meeting with agriculture leaders in South Dakota about the renewable fuel standard. @EPAScottPruitt/Twitter

This story was updated.

Buffeted by reports of opulent spending and misuse of power, Scott Pruitt left Washington, D.C., last week for an agriculture tour touting his support for farmers.

The EPA chief found little reprieve in the Corn Belt.


Farmers and agriculture groups are furious at his agency’s actions on the renewable fuel standard, which requires blending biofuels into the nation’s gasoline supply.

Both critics and supporters of Pruitt are wondering whether he will either quit or be fired, and being in the middle of a fight over the RFS has shaken his standing with would-be allies.

Pruitt’s EPA has provided several small refiners waivers for renewable fuel credits. Oil groups say the new administration is following the law and compensating for an overly stingy Obama-era EPA.

The agency also gave waivers to three of energy giant Andeavor’s smallest refineries. It was the first exemption for a company of Andeavor’s size. Renewable fuel credit prices hit five-year lows in late May.

With Pruitt on their turf, ethanol advocates let fly.

In Kansas, the chairman of the Anderson County Republican Committee called him "a dead man walking," and the CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association, Bob Dinneen, wrote a blog post wondering whether Pruitt’s trip was "anything more than a hollow good will tour to deflect attention from his anti-ethanol policy."

Biofuel ad. Photo credit: Growth Energy/Facebook
A Facebook ad looking to pressure Pruitt on the renewable fuel standard. | Growth Energy/Facebook

Growth Energy, the top ethanol industry trade group, launched a sustained online ad barrage that tracked Pruitt’s swing through corn-reliant states, according to social media ad data.

"Welcome to Nebraska, Scott Pruitt — will you finally choose farm families over Big Oil?" read one Facebook ad. The accompanying image opposed a three-generation farm family against an oil refinery. The same ad ran in Iowa and South Dakota.

Former Sens. Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) and Jim Talent (R-Mo.) — both of whom helped implement the RFS — called on Pruitt to halt waivers to big oil refiners, according to a release by the National Biodiesel Board.

Outside spending groups have also waded in to slam Pruitt.

American Future Fund, a dark-money outfit that was once part of the Koch network, debuted a television ad accusing Pruitt of "embarrassing" President Trump with near-weekly scandals.

As a 501(c)(4) group, or a political nonprofit, AFF does not disclose its donors, but The New York Times reported in 2010 that the group began with a large contribution from Bruce Rastetter, a co-founder and former chief executive of Hawkeye Energy Holdings LLC, one of the largest ethanol producers in the nation.

Rastetter, once a board member at Growth Energy, is one of the most powerful agriculture industry advocates in the GOP. He supported the president’s 2016 run, served on the campaign’s agriculture committee and was seen as a possible administration appointee during the transition.

Industry made sure to prop up its friends.

Digital ads from Growth Energy thanked Agriculture Secretary Sonny Perdue and Republican Iowa Sens. Joni Ernst and Chuck Grassley for supporting year-round sales of 15 percent ethanol fuel, which EPA restricts in summer months. The ongoing campaign was seen between 10,000 and 50,000 times, according to online ad data.

Ernst and Grassley, the leading RFS proponents in Congress, have been tough on Pruitt in recent weeks. Grassley said he would call for Pruitt’s resignation if EPA continues granting the refinery waivers.

Iowa Republican Sens. Chick Grassley and Joni Ernst. Photo credit: Wikipedia (Grassley); Gage Skidmore/Flickr (Ernst)
Iowa Republican Sens. Chuck Grassley and Joni Ernst have been critical of Pruitt over actions related to biofuels. | Wikipedia (Grassley); Gage Skidmore/Flickr (Ernst)

In a June 6 call with reporters, the senator said Pruitt misled senators during the confirmation process by suggesting he’d support ethanol.

"I know he’s had meetings with Democratic senators saying he’s pro-ethanol," Grassley said. "But all the actions are contrary. He’s hoodwinked all of us who believed him" (E&E News PM, June 6).

Like many of his actions in office, Pruitt’s moves on biofuel credits look to benefit the oil industry, but they run up against promises by Trump. On the campaign trail in 2016 and in the White House, Trump has repeated support for corn farmers.

Ethanol backers are careful not to hit Trump in their volleys at Pruitt, framing the EPA chief as the problem, not his boss.

In April, the president promised to allow 15 percent ethanol all year, but no policy changes followed.

Midwestern Democrats in red states are eager to leverage Pruitt’s support for oil and gas at ethanol’s expense, a chance to hit the administration.

The North Dakota Democratic Party accused Rep. Kevin Cramer, a Republican Senate nominee, of "failing" the state for his role on the Republican Study Committee, which opposes ethanol subsidies. Cramer faces Democrat Sen. Heidi Heitkamp in one of the midterm’s most consequential Senate contests.

Nebraska Democratic Senate nominee Jane Raybould began anti-Pruitt ads on June 4 that ran through his visit last weekend.

In Iowa, meanwhile, Democratic Rep. Dave Loebsack’s campaign page blamed Pruitt for "policies that prioritize Big Oil" and hurt farmers.

State Rep. Abby Finkenauer (D), a top party recruit in the competitive 1st District, did not call out Pruitt by name but referenced "shady backroom deals that would harm our renewable energy industry."

Reporter Marc Heller contributed.