How ‘draining the swamp’ backfired spectacularly in Va.

By Kavya Balaraman | 05/12/2017 07:52 AM EDT

CHESAPEAKE, Va. — Chris Lowie has been keeping a watchful eye on the pitch-black waters of the Great Dismal Swamp for more than a year.

The Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge.

The Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge. Photo by the Fish and Wildlife Service, courtesy of Wikipedia.

CHESAPEAKE, Va. — Chris Lowie has been keeping a watchful eye on the pitch-black waters of the Great Dismal Swamp for more than a year.

The swamp, a 112,000-acre tangle of lush vegetation and dark soil with a name out of a fairy tale and a history that dates back to George Washington, has seen better times. After centuries of being drained and logged, the swamp, straddling the Virginia-North Carolina border, has transformed from a moist wetland to a dry mass of peaty soil that’s constantly emitting carbon and frequently sparking wildfires.

But Lowie, the manager of the Great Dismal Swamp National Wildlife Refuge, thinks he’s figured out a way to bring it back to normal: by controlling its water flow.


"Only 3 percent of the planet is peatland. But that 3 percent can sequester 33 times more carbon than any other type of soil or forest," said Lowie. "So from a global perspective, projects that manage wetlands are really important."

Lowie’s solution is simple. It hinges on a network of aluminum dams — what Lowie calls water control structures — fitted into the ditches that crisscross the swamp and drain out its water. By placing them in the right spots and operating them in the right way, the managers of the refuge can control how water flows under and through the swamp, keeping the soil wet and preventing it from spitting out carbon on a daily basis.

The water control structures comprise metal frames and a series of bars that can be dropped to prevent water from passing through or raised to allow more to flow. The entire project, funded with a $3 million grant from the Department of the Interior provided under a 2013 act that funded Superstorm Sandy relief work, includes 14 of these structures. Twelve have already been installed across the ditches of the northeastern part of the swamp. The last two will be completed this summer, and when it’s done, said Lowie, water can be routed through the swamp to reduce the risk of wildfire and carbon release.

"We figure this project will affect around 30,000 acres of the refuge," said Lowie, pointing to one of the structures on Portsmouth Ditch.

The ditch, a 26-mile-long canal that runs from a lake tucked inside the swamp, was initially constructed as a source of water to the nearby city of Portsmouth, Va. Now, it’s a strip of black sludge and water — dark because it’s been steeped in peaty soil for so long — and clogged with leaves and some fallen branches. When it rains over the swamp, the canal fills up quickly but then drains water into a larger canal, from which it flows out of the swampland.

The water control structures could change that, said David Byrd, program supervisor with the Fish and Wildlife Service and manager of the restoration project.

"We can put these boards in and stage the water up as high or low as we want," explained Byrd. "We can control where the water’s going, both to wet the land again and to prevent floods. It allows the refuge to more actively and effectively manage the water levels to restore the wetlands."

Restoring the wetlands could make a huge difference for the people who live in the neighboring towns of Suffolk and Chesapeake, as well as housing developments that are currently cropping up along the fringes of the swamp.

Surveyed and drained by George Washington

Water control structure inspection
Chris Lowie, the manager of the Great Dismal Swamp Wildlife Refuge, and David Byrd, program supervisor with the Fish and Wildlife Service, inspect a water control structure on the northeast corner of the swamp. | Photo by Kavya Balaraman.

The peaty mantle of the Great Dismal Swamp began to develop around 10,000 years ago. About 3,000 years ago, it extended more than 1 million acres. Because the area had a poor drainage system, the peat stayed wet, preventing decomposition and ensuring the carbon was locked in the soil.

Scientists aren’t sure exactly how much carbon the swamp contains. Ken Krauss, an ecologist with the U.S. Geological Survey, is part of a team trying to figure it out. He said all wetland ecosystems suck in carbon dioxide during photosynthesis and then convert it to carbon below the ground — sort of like a sponge that’s pulling in greenhouse gases from the air.

"On a small scale, that doesn’t matter too much, but when you multiple that across the world, wetlands are a significant sink for carbon dioxide," he added.

But the United States has a long history of viewing swamplands as areas that need to be drained, a philosophy that President Trump and his supporters also like to espouse.

The Great Dismal Swamp was first drained in the 1700s by a company set up by George Washington, with the intention of converting it into agricultural land. It dug a network of ditches into the soil, drawing away the water and changing the hydrology of the swamp completely. But when the company found that the land still wasn’t suitable for agriculture, logging companies moved in and began to profit off the trees in the wetland.

"As the swamp drained, more of the peat carbon dried out, and as a result, a lot of the carbon was oxidized. There was a tremendous volume of peat loss, which resulted in the discharge of methane, carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases," said Brian van Eerden, southern rivers program director with the Nature Conservancy, which is also involved in the project.

The carbon loss also caused the land to begin to sink. Now some of its trees stand on exposed roots as high as a couple of feet off the ground, and the drained swamp has become more prone to wildfires. Feeding off the peaty soils, the fires could last for extended periods of time, burning deep within the ground and sometimes bursting up in other areas. Two large fires spread across the region in 2008 and again in 2011; they burned for months and required around $20 million to finally put out. During the second one, said Byrd, thick plumes of smoke drifted as far north as Annapolis, Md. The smoke also blanketed neighborhood communities, posing health risks to the people who lived there.

The new water management system could help prevent that by offering refuge managers something they didn’t have before: control.

The dangers of over-wetting

Water control structure construction
Construction work on one of the last water control structures at the swamp. | Photo by Kavya Balaraman.

If it rains and water fills up in ditches, said Byrd, the refuge can pull down the bars and stage the water up the dam, ensuring that it seeps into the swamp rather than flows out of it. Because of the multitude of structures, the refuge can even stage that water up and down the ditches, transporting water to parts of the swamp that are drier and customizing the amount depending on the vegetation and topography of that particular region.

"Essentially, what we’d be doing is increasing the residence time of the water," said Lowie. "That means that if I drop an orange in a ditch up here, it’ll take longer to get down here. Right now, the ditches are all funnels, but if we can move the water where we want, we can let the wetland be a wetland."

Rewetting the peat will also make the chemistry of the soil less susceptible to catching fire, said van Eerden, by reducing oxidization. For residents of nearby towns, this means less hazards, smoke and air pollutants.

"What releases the carbon is the chronic decomposition of the peat, as well as fire. This can reduce that risk, so you don’t have that acute, immediate release of carbon," said Lowie.

Lowie and Byrd have worked with a hydrologist to identify a sort of baseline level to keep the water at — one that will keep the land hydrated but prevent flooding. Once the last structure is in, they plan to start feeding and stopping water in the canals of the swamp to keep it at that approximate height. It’s a conservative estimate, but Lowie is wary of filling the ground with water after centuries of remaining dry.

His caution seems warranted. According to Krauss, wetting the swamp has a host of benefits — but over-wetting it could have the opposite effect.

"If you permanently flood a wetland, you open it up to greater methane emissions," he explained. "Methane is roughly 25 times more potent than carbon dioxide in terms of its ability to warm the environment. What you don’t want to do is manage the swamp in a way that takes up a lot of the carbon in the soil, but in the process emits a lot of methane."

The system should be up and running this summer, the refuge managers say, who are planning to unveil it in the second week of May. Once that’s done, they can start monitoring how the control structures are working. To do so, they’ve set up a network of surface water gauges and groundwater wells that track the level of water both above and below the ground and have received funding to continue the monitoring for the next five years.

"This is both for today and for the future," he said. "Today, it’s about reducing the impacts of fires and flooding. For the future, it’s about doing something good for the habitat, rewetting the peat and allowing the swamp to be a swamp."