State climate plans rely on federal funding, analysts say

By Adam Aton | 03/25/2025 06:17 AM EDT

Democrats had hoped the plans would drive locally driven action. But states assumed a level of federal investment unlikely under President Donald Trump.

U.S. Steel Edgar Thomson Steel Works is seen along the Monongahela River, Pennsylvania.

U.S. Steel Edgar Thomson Steel Works is seen along the Monongahela River in Braddock, Pennsylvania. The state is among several that got grants during the Biden administration to cut industrial emissions. Drew Angerer/Getty Images

The Biden administration succeeded at getting almost every state to draft a climate plan.

But most rely on federal funding, leaving them on shaky ground as President Donald Trump pledges to roll back climate policy and investment.

A new analysis from Evergreen Action and RMI found that only a few states have climate plans that can stand on their own. Forty-five states submitted so-called Priority Climate Action Plans to EPA, using money made available through the Inflation Reduction Act.

Advertisement

Many state plans were vague about what exactly they wanted to do, often defaulting to generalities like improving “energy efficiency” — the most common industrial strategy across plans. Analysts say that’s especially problematic for the industrial sector.

GET FULL ACCESS