Two rules limiting Endangered Species Act protections advance

By Ian M. Stevenson | 06/08/2026 04:01 PM EDT

One proposal would require federal agencies to consider “the economic impact, the impact on national security, and any other relevant impact” before designating critical habitat for listed species.

Male greater sage grouse perform mating rituals for a female grouse (not pictured).

Male greater sage grouse perform mating rituals for a female grouse (not pictured) on a lake outside Walden, Colorado. David Zalubowski/AP

Two major changes to Endangered Species Act regulations have completed White House review last week that would reduce protections for threatened plants and animals and likely reduce the range of critical habitat designations.

One change approved Friday by the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs would remove the “blanket 4(d) rule,” which awards species dubbed “threatened” the same protections as those that are “endangered.” Threatened species are considered under the law as being in less danger of imminent extinction.

Under the current framework, the Fish and Wildlife Service grants threatened species the same protections of those designated endangered. Those protections include prohibitions on harm or harassment and also require federal activities like energy development and other infrastructure to undergo extensive reviews to ensure projects will not jeopardize the survival of any imperiled species.

Advertisement

The changes proposed by the Trump administration would lead to specific plans for each threatened species, which could lead some species to receive less robust protections. Under the proposal, there would be no change to protections given to endangered species.

GET FULL ACCESS