When Mother Nature takes an unpaid cut of the Colorado River

By Jennifer Yachnin | 09/18/2024 01:18 PM EDT

Officials in Colorado, New Mexico, Utah and Wyoming argue that the river’s next operating plan should acknowledge losses due to poor snowpack and low precipitation.

The Colorado River as it runs through Kremmling, Colorado, in the northwest part of the state.

The Colorado River as it runs through Kremmling, Colorado, in the northwest part of the state. Jennifer Yachnin/POLITICO's E&E News

Water rights to the Colorado River are a notoriously valuable commodity: The flows support verdant agricultural lands in Southern California and Arizona, as well as major cities like Phoenix, Las Vegas and Los Angeles.

So when the federal government needs to curb use on the 1,450-mile waterway, it has long opted to open up its checkbook and pay up — such as with a recent emergency effort to protect hydropower operations on the river, which cost the Biden administration $1.2 billion for a three-year deal.

But when Mother Nature cuts back on the supply at its source, it’s a much different story.

Advertisement

No water. No payments. No IOUs for next year.

GET FULL ACCESS