Judges appear skeptical on challenge to EPA delayed steel rule

By Alex Guillén | 05/11/2026 01:28 PM EDT

Judges indicated they felt EPA had justified giving integrated iron and steel mills more time to comply with a Biden-era rule the agency intends to rewrite.

A portion of the Cleveland Cliffs-Cleveland Works is pictured on Monday, Aug. 14, 2023, in Cleveland.

EPA has delayed deadlines for more stringent emissions rules for integrated iron and steel mills, such as Cleveland-Cliffs' Cleveland Works. Sue Ogrocki/AP

A panel of federal judges Monday appeared to be split but leaning toward EPA in a fight over the Trump administration’s delay of stronger air pollution rules for the steel industry.

The delayed rule is part of a massive deregulatory effort undertaken by EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and, in this case, gave the industry breathing room while the agency works to rewrite the underlying Biden-era requirements.

Environmental challengers painted the delay as subtext for a broader reconsideration of the strengthened Biden-era rule, but a majority of the panel indicated they felt EPA had justified the delay.

Advertisement

“It seems like there is a fairly strong argument that when they make the finding of impracticability here … they are allowed to do that and they are allowed to change the compliance date,” said Judge Bradley Garcia, a Biden appointee.

GET FULL ACCESS