Reform advocates see worrying hole in Trump team

By Arianna Skibell | 01/24/2017 06:51 AM EST

Despite his stated commitment to overhaul regulations, President Trump has yet to announce his pick to lead the White House’s regulatory office. And officials from former administrations say an extended delay could affect the president’s agenda and his ability to implement it.

From left: Sally Katzen led the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs during the Clinton administration, John Graham during the George W. Bush administration and Cass Sunstein during the Obama administration.

From left: Sally Katzen led the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs during the Clinton administration, John Graham during the George W. Bush administration and Cass Sunstein during the Obama administration. Photos courtesy of the Podesta Group and Wikipedia.

Despite his stated commitment to make regulatory reform a top priority, President Trump has yet to announce his pick to lead the White House’s regulatory office.

The Office of Management and Budget’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs is tasked with reviewing agency actions, acting as the gatekeeper for the most impactful government policies.

Trump’s pick of Rep. Mick Mulvaney (R-S.C.) to lead OMB is a strong indication that budget and rule cutting will be a priority. But people familiar with OIRA say any delay in picking its leader could affect the new administration’s regulatory strategy and implementation.


The office launched during the early 1980s following the Paperwork Reduction Act and has historically worked to balance the president’s political interests with science.

"OIRA is largely a reactive office," said Stuart Shapiro, a former employee who served under both Presidents Clinton and George W. Bush.

"When an agency wants to issue a regulation they send it to OIRA, and then OIRA reviews it both for its analytical quality and whether or not it aligns with the preferences of the president," Shapiro said.

Michael Greenstone, economist and former member of the Obama administration, said there are two models for how the office can be run.

"It can be run as a tool of political goals, a servant to political will," he said. "Or alternatively, it can be run as an honest broker that’s committed to determining what science and economics and our understanding of the world tell us about the costs and the benefits of various regulatory interventions."

A perennial debate related to OIRA is the battle between industry-minded conservatives who want to slash regulations they say prevent economic growth and public health and environmental advocates who see rules as essential safeguards.

Greenstone said the administrator plays a crucial role in setting the tone for the office’s agenda and balancing competing interests.

"In the absence of an administrator, it’s more likely that political objectives from the White House will guide decisionmaking," he said.

Heidi King, who worked at OIRA under Presidents Clinton, George W. Bush and Obama, said she was consistently pleased to see that career staff cared more about the data and serving the American people than political aim.

"You have to be mindful of the politics, but that’s not what drives the recommendations of the office," said King, noting that career workers populate OIRA.

Shapiro said the lack of an OIRA head makes it more difficult for the office to have a significant voice at the regulatory table, however.

"Whether that’s important or not depends on what issues come up during the time we’re waiting for an administrator," Shapiro said.

If a number of agencies remain leaderless, then the whole executive branch will merely move more slowly, he said. But if agencies begin operating at full speed, the president will have to find counsel outside OIRA.

Also, Congress has pushed a number of regulatory reform measures (E&E Daily, Jan. 12). The administration will need to form positions on those bills.

"Your best source of information on those issues is OIRA," Shapiro said.

He noted that while John Graham was waiting to be confirmed as administrator under President Bush in 2001, the White House general counsel advised on regulatory action in his stead.

Who will it be?

Many observers have voiced concern that Trump has not named his pick. "I’m surprised they haven’t identified a candidate given they are making statements about regulation being a top priority," King said.

James Goodwin, senior policy analyst with the Center for Progressive Reform, said it’s possible Trump is waiting for the Senate to confirm Mulvaney.

"I would expect the OIRA Administrator announcement soon, especially if Mulvaney clears through this week, assuming that whole nanny tax scandal doesn’t derail his nomination altogether," Goodwin wrote in an email.

Mulvaney, who is slated for two confirmation hearings today, recently came under fire for failing to pay more than $15,000 in payroll taxes for a household employee for four years (see related story).

"Because they have not identified an OIRA administrator, Mulvaney’s owning the regulatory conversation right now," King said.

Mulvaney has been outspoken about the need to institutionalize a regulatory review process that allows outdated or ineffective rules to be repealed, an effort Obama also supported.

While Trump has not publicly announced his pick to head OIRA, it’s possible the decision has been made behind the scenes. Delays are not uncommon.

Bush formally nominated Graham in March of 2001 after offering him the job in January. The Senate did not confirm Graham until the summer.

Likewise, Obama’s pick to lead the office, economist Cass Sunstein, was not announced until April 2009. Sunstein was confirmed that September.

Big changes in store

"It’s famously said about OIRA and I think it’s probably true: It’s the most important job you’ve never heard of," Greenstone said.

But Susan Dudley, who oversaw executive branch regulations as OIRA administrator under Bush from 2007 to 2009, said the office will be particularly important in the incoming administration and is likely to play a major role in the president’s regulatory reform agenda.

"The [president] has promised big changes in regulation (including to eliminate 2 rules for every new rule issued)," she wrote in an email. "To make good on those promises in a way that benefits Americans, he’ll need the expertise the career staff at OIRA bring to regulatory policy and analysis, and to administrative procedure."

Dudley said one option for Trump is to increase the office’s staff to accomplish these goals, though that is unlikely given his recent federal hiring freeze (Greenwire, Jan. 23).

Trump’s exact plans remain in the works. While the websites and are still up and running, the White House’s webpage describing OIRA and the executive orders that power it is no longer up.

"Could be nothing. But it’s not clear why they would eliminate those OIRA pages unless they are planning something big soon. What could they be planning?" Goodwin said.

He added: "I would expect OIRA’s role to be a little different in the Trump administration. After all, Trump has nominated several individuals to run agencies who are clearly hostile to those agencies’ statutory missions."

Shapiro agreed that OIRA’s role will be determined by how agencies choose to operate. "If they try to issue a significant number of regulations, then OIRA will act as something of a break on those," he said.

"OIRA would be an important part of slowing down the regulatory process if everyone behaves how they do in a typical Republican administration," he said.

Shapiro also pointed out that if agencies want to deregulate or toss out Obama-era rules, they will still have to go through OIRA.

"It’s a lot of work," he said. "It’s going to take a similar amount of time to get rid of rules, and that’s before you get sued."

He added that the Clean Power Plan would be particularly time-consuming to repeal, as it’s "a massively complicated rule."

Reform OIRA?

Goodwin said he would not be surprised if Trump circumvented OIRA procedure by simply nixing two major executive orders governing the office.

Clinton’s 1993 E.O. 12866, titled "Regulatory Planning and Review," establishes and governs the process under which OIRA reviews agency draft and proposed final rules.

"The objectives of the Executive Order are to enhance planning and coordination with respect to both new and existing regulations; to reaffirm the primacy of Federal agencies in the regulatory decision-making process; to restore the integrity and legitimacy of regulatory review and oversight; and to make the process more accessible and open to the public," according to the now-defunct website.

Another is a 2011 Obama order, E.O. 13563, titled "Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review," that reaffirmed and supplemented Clinton’s order.

Goodwin said it is entirely possible that both orders are tossed out under President Trump and possibly replaced with the real estate mogul’s controversial one-in, two-out plan (Greenwire, Nov. 11, 2016).

OIRA derives the bulk of its power from executive orders. The underlying statue is more limited. If Trump decides to discard the orders, the office could look remarkably different.

"The president is not going to be engaged in every decision, but they send a message for how they want things to be done," Greenstone said. "OIRA drives within those lanes, wherever they’re set."

But he said it is important to remember that many regulations involve a trade-off between economic growth and other desirable social outcomes, like environmental quality.

"And wishing that trade-off didn’t exist, does not make it so," Greenstone said. "To ignore the benefits of regulations will come at the expense of a worse environment that leads to shorter and sicker lives."