States may be caught in crosshairs of forest rule repeal

By Marc Heller | 06/12/2026 06:43 AM EDT

A Republican proposal to open roadless areas of national forests to logging creates confusion for states that want to keep some restrictions.

Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M).

Senate Energy and Natural Resources ranking member Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.) said a GOP-led initiative to nullify the Clinton-era roadless rule in national forests makes it all but impossible for individual states to negotiate their own deals with the Forest Service. Mark Schiefelbein/AP

A Republican-led effort to open more areas in national forests to road construction and logging would let two states — Idaho and Colorado — keep their restrictions, but other states may have a hard time if they want similar protections.

That’s one of the wrinkles in the Republican proposal to rescind the 25-year-old roadless-area conservation rule that blocks new roads and logging on tens of millions of acres of national forests.

The legislation passed the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on a party-line vote Wednesday as an amendment to S. 140, the “Wildfire Prevention Act,” which would increase annual goals for forest thinning and for prescribed fire. Lawmakers on opposite sides of the debate gave varying interpretations of the amendment Thursday.

Advertisement

New Mexico Sen. Martin Heinrich, the committee’s ranking Democrat, suggested states that want to follow Idaho and Colorado would face a high bar in negotiating deals with the Forest Service.

GET FULL ACCESS